Why the study?
Does a nurse-led cardiovascular risk management intervention improve lifestyle adherence and reduce cardiovascular risk in primary prevention patients?
Does a nurse-led cardiovascular risk management intervention improve lifestyle adherence and reduce cardiovascular risk in primary prevention patients?
An intensive nurse-led cardiovascular risk management intervention using decision aids and motivational interviewing did not significantly improve lifestyle adherence or reduce 10-year cardiovascular risk compared to a minimal intervention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intensive nurse-led intervention confers no advantage over minimal care in primary prevention; challenges efficacy of decision aids and motivational interviewing.
BACKGROUND: Preventive guidelines on cardiovascular risk management recommend lifestyle changes. Support for lifestyle changes may be a useful task for practice nurses, but the effect of such interventions in primary prevention is not clear. We examined the effect of involving patients in nurse-led cardiovascular risk management on lifestyle adherence and cardiovascular risk. METHODS: We performed a cluster randomized controlled trial in 25 practices that included 615 patients. The intervention consisted of nurse-led cardiovascular risk management, including risk assessment, risk communication, a decision aid and adapted motivational interviewing. The control group received a minimal nurse-led intervention. The self-reported outcome measures at one year were smoking, alcohol use, diet and physical activity. Nurses assessed 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk after one year. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the intervention groups. The effect of the intervention on the consumption of vegetables and physical activity was small, and some differences were only significant for subgroups. The effects of the intervention on the intake of fat, fruit and alcohol and smoking were not significant. We found no effect between the groups for cardiovascular 10-year risk. INTERPRETATION: Nurse-led risk communication, use of a decision aid and adapted motivational interviewing did not lead to relevant differences between the groups in terms of lifestyle changes or cardiovascular risk, despite significant within-group differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loon et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: