Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blind study investigated the efficacy of continuous and patient-controlled ropivacaine infusion via a popliteal sciatic perineural catheter in ambulatory patients undergoing moderately painful orthopedic surgery of the foot or ankle. METHODS: Preoperatively, patients (n = 30) received a posterior popliteal sciatic perineural catheter and nerve block. Postoperatively, patients were discharged home with a portable infusion pump delivering 0.2% ropivacaine (500 ml) in one of three dosing regimens: the basal group (12-ml/h basal rate, 0.05-ml patient-controlled bolus dose), the basal-bolus group (8-ml/h basal rate, 4-ml bolus dose), or the bolus group (0.3-ml/h basal rate, 9.9-ml bolus dose). RESULTS: The bolus group experienced an increase in baseline pain, breakthrough pain incidence and intensity, and sleep disturbances compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Compared with the basal-bolus group, the basal group experienced an increase in these outcome measures only after local anesthetic reservoir exhaustion, which occurred earlier than in the other two groups (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Satisfaction scores did not differ among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that when providing analgesia with 0.2% ropivacaine via a popliteal sciatic perineural catheter after moderately painful surgery of the foot or ankle, a continuous infusion is required to optimize infusion benefits. Furthermore, adding patient-controlled bolus doses allows for a lower continuous basal rate and decreased local anesthetic consumption and thereby increases the duration of infusion benefits when in an ambulatory environment with a limited local anesthetic reservoir.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ilfeld et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: