Why the study?
Understanding how the voltage sensor domain drives pore opening has been limited by a lack of closed-state structures, impairing the search for novel therapeutics.
Provides a structural framework for the closed state of the Shaker potassium channel and its binding to dalfampridine, enabling future structure-based drug design for neurological disorders.
Provides structural insights into Shaker channel gating; leaves open whether findings will guide new excitability therapies.
The generation and propagation of action potentials in neurons depend on the coordinated activation of voltage-dependent sodium and potassium channels. Potassium channels of the Shaker family regulate neuronal excitability through voltage-dependent opening and closing of their ion conduction pore. This family of channels is an important therapeutic target, particularly in multiple sclerosis where the inhibitor dalfampridine (4-aminopyridine) is used to improve nerve conduction. The molecular details of how the voltage sensor domain drives opening of the pore domain has been limited by the lack of closed-state structures, also impairing the search for novel drugs. Using AlphaFold2-based conformational sampling methods we identify a structural model for the closed Shaker potassium channel where movement of the voltage sensor drives the opening trough interactions between the S4-S5 linker and S6 helix. We show experimentally that breakage of a backbone hydrogen bond is a critical part of the activation pathway. Through docking we identify a hydrophobic cavity formed by the pore domain helices that binds dalfampridine in the closed state. Our results demonstrate how voltage sensor movement drives pore opening and provide a structural framework for developing new therapeutic agents targeting the closed state. We anticipate this work will enable structure-based drug design efforts focused on state-dependent modulation of voltage-gated ion channels for the treatment of neurological disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bernardo I. Pinto (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: