The effects and interactions of added artificial substrate with different stocking densities of prawns were evaluated. Juvenile prawns (0.2 ± 0.1 g) were stocked into 12 0.04‐ha ponds at 60,000ha and 120,000/ha with and without substrate. Added substrate consisted of horizontal plastic mesh and strips of “oyster netting” sutlicient to increase available surface area 80%. There were no statistically significant ( P > 0.05) interactions between stocking density and presence of added substrate, allowing these main effects to be compared separately. Increasing stocking density produced a significant increase ( P < 0.01) in total production but a significant decrease ( P < 0.01) in average prawn size and production ( P < 0.05) of market size prawns (>20 g, ‐27%; > 30 g, ‐56%). Added substrate also produced a significant increase ( P < 0.05) in total production (18%). However, average prawn size was not decreased and production of marketable shrimp was increased (>20 g, 25%; >30 g, 19%). Feed conversion ratios were significantly decreased (P < 0.01) by the presence of substrate. Increased stocking density significantly increased ( P < 0.05) the percentage of males which were small males (SM) and decreased ( P < 0.01) the percentage of orange claw males (OC), but had no impact ( P > 0.05) on numbers of reproductive (RF) and virgin (VF) female morphotypes. Increased stocking density also produced a significant decrease ( P < 0.05) in average size of OC, RF, and VF morphotypes while the addition of substrate had no statistically significant impact (P > 0.05) on the number or size of different morphotypes. The mathematical relationship between available surface area and average prawn size should be determined to produce recommended inclusion rates for added substrate based on desired levels of total production, stocking rates, and optimum market sizes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tidwell et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: