The participation of transnational advocacy networks (TANs) in the policy processes of the European Union (EU) is a potential site of substantial representation of women (SRW). In the article, it is argued that the institutional context can both enable and constrain civil society actors' claims-making. TANs employ framing strategies to make their claims resonate with or challenge the dominant discourse of the EU policies. The institutions use contested frames to constitute legitimate claims-makers, by recognising certain claims as more valid than others. The possibilities of SRW are delimited, since the pluralisation of claims is not sufficiently prioritised by the institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lise Rolandsen Agustín (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: