The following classical problem is solved and the results are applied to minimize the mean-square error ε of communication and data compression systems: "a stationary random input signalx(t)is prefiltered, corrupted by noisen(t), sampled everyTseconds, and finally postfiltered to yield outputx̂(t). Let the desired outputz(t) = a(t) x(t)wherea(t)is any real function oftand convolution. Determine the linear timeinvariant pre- and postfilters which jointly minimizeε = E\{1/T∫T₀[z(t) - x̂(t)]²dt\}subject to power constraintP = E\{[k(t) f(t) x(t)]²\}.'' OperatorE{}denotes expected value,k(t)is a real function oft, andf(t)is the prefilter impulse response. Appropriate choice ofT,P,k(t), andn(t)makes the solution applicable to amplitude, angle, pulse-amplitude (PAM), pulse-code (PCM), and differential pulsecode (DPCM) modulation systems, and data compression systems. In this analysis no restrictions are placed on the input-signal spectrum, the noise spectrum, or the passbands of the filters; furthermore, the cross correlation between signal and noise is taken into consideration. Necessary and sufficient conditions are obtained for the jointly optimum pre- and postfilters. The performance obtainable using these optimum filters is compared with that obtainable using suboptimum filters. One suboptimum filtering scheme is derived which yields virtually the same performance as optimum filters and has the practical advantage that the filter transfer characteristics are independent of noisen(t)in many cases of interest. In applying the results to PCM, DPCM, and data compression systems, the filters, sampling rate, and quantizer are jointly optimized. The performance obtainable for various filtering schemes and various communication systems is compared with the optimum attainable as calculated from information theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: