// Benny Björkblom 1 , Carl Wibom 2 , Pär Jonsson 1 , Lina Mörén 1 , Ulrika Andersson 2 , Tom Børge Johannesen 3 , Hilde Langseth 3 , Henrik Antti 1, * , Beatrice Melin 2, * 1 Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden 2 Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden 3 Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, N-0304 Oslo, Norway * Shared senior authorship with equal contribution Correspondence to: Benny Björkblom, email: benny.bjorkblom@umu.se Keywords: population-based, serum metabolite, vitamin E, antioxidants, brain tumor Received: February 03, 2016 Accepted: April 23, 2016 Published: May 09, 2016 ABSTRACT Glioblastoma is associated with poor prognosis with a median survival of one year. High doses of ionizing radiation is the only established exogenous risk factor. To explore new potential biological risk factors for glioblastoma, we investigated alterations in metabolite concentrations in pre-diagnosed serum samples from glioblastoma patients diagnosed up to 22 years after sample collection, and undiseased controls. The study points out a latent biomarker for future glioblastoma consisting of nine metabolites (γ-tocopherol, α-tocopherol, erythritol, erythronic acid, myo-inositol, cystine, 2-keto-L-gluconic acid, hypoxanthine and xanthine) involved in antioxidant metabolism. We detected significantly higher serum concentrations of α-tocopherol (p=0.0018) and γ-tocopherol (p=0.0009) in future glioblastoma cases. Compared to their matched controls, the cases showed a significant average fold increase of α- and γ-tocopherol levels: 1.2 for α-T (p=0.018) and 1.6 for γ-T (p=0.003). These tocopherol levels were associated with a glioblastoma odds ratio of 1.7 (α-T, 95% CI:1.0-3.0) and 2.1 (γ-T, 95% CI:1.2-3.8). Our exploratory metabolomics study detected elevated serum levels of a panel of molecules with antioxidant properties as well as oxidative stress generated compounds. Additional studies are necessary to confirm the association between the observed serum metabolite pattern and future glioblastoma development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Björkblom et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: