Some might question the relevance or value of what we know about self-leadership given recent business and societal contexts that seem to discourage personal responsibility and even reward destructive behavior. This article is intended to help expand our thinking via a journey along a “self-leadership high road.” After reviewing what we already know about self-leadership, this paper goes on to investigate ways that research and practice might move to a higher level. The concept of higher-level self-leadership (supported by the metaphor of a self-leadership high road) is addressed in terms of the degree to which self-influence processes are characterized by authenticity, responsibility, and increasing capacity. Authenticity encompasses the significance of addressing higher-level standards (e.g., considering the why and what of self-influence beyond the how). Responsibility is viewed in a way that is consistent with commonly understood elements of corporate social responsibility. Capacity centers on the expansion of self-leadership potential, which can bolster results reflecting authentic and responsible ends. Specific facets of higher-level self-leadership that are discussed include the pursuit of virtue, collaboration as a self-leadership strategy, and self-influence of emotions. In addition, the paper addresses health and fitness, elements of the physical environment (e.g., colors, scents, music, and sounds), and failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charles C. Manz (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: