Key result
High admission CONUT score is linked to poorer functional recovery and reduced 6-month post-stroke survival.
Why the study?
Does the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score at admission predict functional recovery, complications, and mortality in patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke?
Cohort (n=938)
Does the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score at admission predict functional recovery, complications, and mortality in patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke?
p-value: p=<0.05
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A higher CONUT score at admission is a significant predictor of poorer functional recovery, increased hospital complications, and higher mortality in patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke.
Choi et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in first-ever acute ischemic stroke (n=938). Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score 5-12 vs. CONUT score 0-4 was evaluated on Functional outcomes (mRS, FIM, FAC) and mortality (p=<0.05). A high Controlling Nutritional Status score (5-12) at admission was significantly associated with poorer functional recovery (p<0.05) and lower survival (p<0.01) at 6 months post-stroke.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: