Key result
Whole chest CT demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value for detecting acute coronary syndrome in low-to-intermediate risk emergency department patients.
Why the study?
Does 64 channel ECG-gated whole chest CT accurately diagnose acute coronary syndrome in low to intermediate risk Emergency Department patients?
Cohort (n=102)
Blinded evaluators
No
Does 64 channel ECG-gated whole chest CT accurately diagnose acute coronary syndrome in low to intermediate risk Emergency Department patients?
Whole chest CT provides excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value for ACS in the ED, but its routine use as a 'triple rule-out' is limited by higher radiation and low prevalence of alternative diagnoses.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and one year prognosis of whole chest, "multiple rule out" CT for coronary artery disease (CAD) in Emergency Department patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: One hundred and two Emergency Department patients at low to intermediate risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), pulmonary embolism and/or acute aortic syndrome underwent a research 64 channel ECG-gated, whole chest CT and a standard of care evaluation. Patients were classified with obstructive CAD with either a coronary CT stenosis greater than 50% or a non-evaluable coronary segment. SOC and 3 month follow up data were used to determine an adjudicated clinical diagnosis. The diagnostic ability of obstructive CAD on CT to identify clinical diagnoses was determined. Patients were followed up for 1 year for cardiac events. Seven (7%) patients were diagnosed with ACS. CT sensitivity to detect obstructive CAD in ACS patients was 100% (95% CI 65%, 100%), negative predictive value 100% (96%, 100%), specificity 88% (80%, 94%), and positive predictive value 39% (17%, 64%). Pulmonary embolism and acute aortic syndrome were not identified in any patients. No cardiac events occurred in patients without obstructive CAD over 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Whole chest CT has high sensitivity and negative predictive value for ACS with excellent one year prognosis in patients without obstructive CAD on CT. The frequency of pulmonary embolism or acute aortic syndrome and the higher radiation dose suggest whole chest CT should be limited to select patients. ClinicalTrials.org #: NCT00855231.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Branch et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Suspected acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, or acute aortic syndrome (n=102). ECG-gated, whole chest CT vs. Standard of care evaluation (adjudicated clinical diagnosis) was evaluated on Sensitivity for detecting acute coronary syndrome (Sensitivity 100%, 95% CI 65%, 100%). Whole chest CT demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value for detecting acute coronary syndrome in low-to-intermediate risk emergency department patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: