Key result
Facial temperature and subjective evaluation were more reliable than electroencephalogram and eye blinking rate for the evaluation of fear.
Facial temperature and subjective evaluation provide more reliable nonintrusive measurements of fear compared to EEG and eye blinking rate.
Most previous research into emotion recognition used either a single modality or multiple modalities of physiological signal. However, the former method allows for limited enhancement of accuracy, and the latter has the disadvantages that its performance can be affected by head or body movements. Further, the latter causes inconvenience to the user due to the sensors attached to the body. Among various emotions, the accurate evaluation of fear is crucial in many applications, such as criminal psychology, intelligent surveillance systems and the objective evaluation of horror movies. Therefore, we propose a new method for evaluating fear based on nonintrusive measurements obtained using multiple sensors. Experimental results based on the t-test, the effect size and the sum of all of the correlation values with other modalities showed that facial temperature and subjective evaluation are more reliable than electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye blinking rate for the evaluation of fear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2015) studied Fear evaluation. Facial temperature and subjective evaluation vs. Electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye blinking rate was evaluated on Reliability for the evaluation of fear. Facial temperature and subjective evaluation were more reliable than electroencephalogram and eye blinking rate for the evaluation of fear.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: