Key result
Evans Index at Reid's baseline shows the strongest correlation with ventricle volume among 2D measures.
Why the study?
Evans' Index and Bicaudate Index are commonly used to evaluate ventricle size, but differences in these linear measures across three scanning baselines and their correlations with ventricle volume needed investigation.
Which scanning baseline provides the most consistent linear measurements (Evans' Index and Bicaudate Index) and best correlates with ventricle volume in healthy volunteers and hydrocephalus patients?
Observational (n=375)
Which scanning baseline provides the most consistent linear measurements (Evans' Index and Bicaudate Index) and best correlates with ventricle volume in healthy volunteers and hydrocephalus patients?
Evans Index measured at Reid's baseline provides the most consistent linear measurement for evaluating ventricle size, though 2D indices have limitations for precise volumetric assessment.
Caution advised using 2D linear indices for ventricular volume estimates; leaves open validation of RBL Evans Index versus 3D measures.
PURPOSE: Evans' Index (EI) and Bicaudate Index (BCI), as two-dimensional linear indexes, are commonly used to evaluate ventricle size. This study is investigated the differences in linear measures at the three kinds of scanning baselines and their correlations with ventricle volume. METHODS: In 186 healthy volunteers,117 hydrocephalus patients with complete skull and 72 hydrocephalus patients without complete skull, the linear indexes, intracranial volume and ventricle volume were calculated by 3D Slicer. Wilcoxon rank test was used for comparisons of the linear indexes at the scanning baselines respectively. Spearman analysis was applied for the correlations between linear indexes and ventricle volume respectively. RESULTS: There were statistical differences in the linear indexes of the three scanning baselines. Comparison of the linear indexes in people from three groups, the difference of linear indexes was minimum at Reid's base line (RBL), but max at supraorbitomeatal line (SML). Compared with the third and the fourth ventricle, the linear indexes had a stronger correlation with lateral ventricle volume or total ventricle volume. On the other hand, EI at RBL had a stronger correlation with ventricle volume, compared with other two kinds of scanning baselines. CONCLUSION: For consistent and representative linear measurements, we recommend using the Evans Index at Reid's baseline (RBL). However, the correlations between linear indices and ventricular volume were only modest, underscoring the limitation of 2D indices for precise volumetric assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Hydrocephalus (n=375). Evans' Index (EI) and Bicaudate Index (BCI) vs. Ventricle volume was evaluated on Correlation between linear indices and ventricle volume at three scanning baselines. The Evans Index at Reid's baseline (RBL) demonstrated the strongest correlation with ventricle volume, though overall correlations between 2D linear indices and 3D volume were only modest.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: