Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper provides an argument for a more dynamic, interrelated understanding of occupational experience through the simultaneous examination of Pierce's three dimensions: pleasure, productivity and restoration. Limited attention has been given to Pierce's notion in part due to a lack of continued exploration of the interrelation of the three dimensions. However a body of new evidence strongly supports the theoretical assumptions of the importance of examining the relationship among pleasure, productivity and restoration to help understand occupational experience. This paper reviews several current theoretical ideas of occupational experience and subsequently argues for the advantage of using a dynamic interrelated view of occupational experience that allows for a deeper understanding of its complexity and idiosyncratic nature within and across people. The implications and limitations of this view of occupational experience, along with future directions for exploration, are presented for occupational science.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karen Atler (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: