Key result
Simultaneous RF and cryoenergy created larger lesions than standard RF (288.1 vs 126.1 mm3, P=0.0333), but adding RF to cryoenergy increased thrombus formation (82.4% vs 12.1%, P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does a hybrid RF and cryoenergy catheter create larger lesions compared to standard RF or cryoablation in a canine model?
RCT (n=20)
randomized factorial design
Does a hybrid RF and cryoenergy catheter create larger lesions compared to standard RF or cryoablation in a canine model?
A novel hybrid catheter combining RF and cryoenergy can create larger lesions than standard RF, though with increased thrombus formation compared to cryoenergy alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hybrid RF-cryo may enlarge lesions yet heighten thrombus risk in animals; leaves open clinical translation.
INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency (RF) and cryoenergy are largely considered independent modalities for the transcatheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. There are numerous theoretical advantages to engineering a system capable of delivering both energy forms. METHODS AND RESULTS: We designed a hybrid steerable catheter capable of delivering RF and cryoenergy independently, sequentially, and simultaneously. The novel catheter system was tested pre-clinically by creating a total of 180 ablation lesions in 20 mongrel dogs. Right atrial and right and left ventricular sites were preselected by a randomized factorial design devised to compare sequential and simultaneous RF and cryoenergy applications to standard RF, irrigated RF, and standard cryoablation. A steerable 4-mm electrode-tip hybrid catheter ("Fire and Ice") was created by modifying a 7 F cryocatheter (Freezor, CryoCath Technologies, Montreal, Canada). RF energy was injected via a copper wire, thermocouples were isolated to reduce RF interference, and 100 KHz band pass filters and RF chokes were added. Sequential low-dose RF (20 W, 60 seconds) preceding or following cryoablation resulted in larger lesions (P = 0.0010). The addition of RF energy did, however, produce more thrombus than cryoenergy alone, with clot detected on 82.4% versus 12.1% of ablation lesions, P < 0.0001. Simultaneously applying the two energy modalities (45 W, 10 or 30 degrees C, 60 seconds) created more voluminous lesions than standard RF ablation (median 288.1 vs 126.1 mm(3), P = 0.0333) of similar dimension to irrigated RF ablation. CONCLUSION: A versatile catheter system was fashioned capable of creating standard cryoablation lesions, standard RF lesions, and simultaneous lesions of similar dimension to irrigated RF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khairy et al. (2007) reported an RCT. Hybrid transcatheter ablation (radiofrequency and cryoenergy) vs. Standard RF, irrigated RF, and standard cryoablation was evaluated on Lesion volume (simultaneous vs standard RF) (p=0.0333). Simultaneous RF and cryoenergy created larger lesions than standard RF (288.1 vs 126.1 mm3, P=0.0333), but adding RF to cryoenergy increased thrombus formation (82.4% vs 12.1%, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: