The study examined the potential of two unmixing approaches for deriving crop-specific normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) profiles so that upon availability of Project for On-Board Autonomy – Vegetation (PROBA-V) imagery in winter 2013, this new data set can be combined with existing Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre – VEGETATION (SPOT-VGT) data despite the differences in spatial resolution (300 m of PROBA-V versus 1 km of SPOT-VGT). To study the problem, two data sets were analysed: (1) a set of 10 temporal NDVI images, with 300 and 1000 m spatial resolution, from the state of São Paulo (Brazil) synthesized from 30 m Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) images, and (2) a corresponding set of 10 observed Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images (250 m spatial resolution). To mimic the influence of noise on the retrieval accuracy, different sensor/atmospheric noise levels were applied to the first data set. For the unmixing analysis, a high-resolution land-cover (LC) map was used. The LC map was derived beforehand using a different set of Landsat TM images. The map distinguishes nine classes, with four different sugarcane stages, two agricultural sub-classes, plus forest, pasture, and urban/water. Unmixing aiming at the retrieval of crop-specific NDVI profiles was done at administrative level. For the synthesized data set it was demonstrated that the ‘true’ NDVI temporal profiles of different land-cover classes (from 30 m TM data) can generally be retrieved with high accuracy. The two simulated sensors (PROBA-V and SPOT-VGT) and the two unmixing algorithms gave similar results. Analysing the MODIS data set, we also found a good correspondence between the modelled NDVI profiles (both approaches) and the (true) Landsat temporal endmembers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atzberger et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: