Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Shaohua Cui 1, * , Wei Zhang 1, * , Liwen Xiong 1 , Feng Pan 1 , Yanjie Niu 1 , Tianqing Chu 1 , Huimin Wang 1 , Yizhuo Zhao 1 , Liyan Jiang 1 1 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Liyan Jiang, email: Jiang_liyan2000@126.com Yizhuo Zhao, email: zhyz920916@126.com Keywords: liquid biopsy, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), capture-based next-generation sequencing, cell-free DNA (cfDNA), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Received: September 23, 2016 Accepted: November 23, 2016 Published: December 01, 2016 ABSTRACT Capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a potentially useful diagnostic method to measure tumor tissue DNA in blood as it can identify concordant mutations between cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and primary tumor DNA in lung cancer patients. In this study, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of capture-based NGS for detecting ALK fusion in plasma cfDNA was assessed. 24 patients with tissue ALK -positivity and 15 who did not harbor ALK fusion were enrolled. 13 ALK -positive samples were identified by capture-based NGS among the 24 samples with tissue ALK -positivity. In addition to EML4-ALK , 2 rare fusion types ( FAM179A-ALK and COL25A1-ALK ) were also identified. The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for all cases were 54.2%, 100% and 71.8%, respectively. For patients without distant metastasis (M0-M1a) and patients with distant metastasis (M1b), the sensitivities were 28.6% and 64.7%, respectively. In the 15 patients who received crizotinib, the estimated median PFS was 9.93 months. Thus, captured-based NGS has acceptable sensitivity and excellent specificity for the detection of ALK fusion in plasma cfDNA, especially for patients with distant metastasis. This non-invasive method is clinically feasible for detecting ALK fusion in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC who cannot undergo traumatic examinations or have insufficient tissue samples for molecular tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: