The influence of the method of identification of the drainage network on its geomorphological characteristics and on its hydrological response is analysed. Blue lines, photo-interpreted networks and networks generated from digital elevation models (DEMs) by an automatic algorithm are compared with field observations for two small alpine catchments. The comparisons are carried out in quantitative terms by using several geomorphological indices and functions and by calculating the hydrological response of the networks as represented by their geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH). The results show that the effect of the identification method on the geomorphological indices and on the hydrological response is significant, and that the threshold area for channel initiation is not constant. Moreover, the available data show a poor correlation between local slope and threshold area. Finally, the influence of the threshold area on the shape of the GIUH is larger when the residence time on the hillslopes is of the same order as the residence time in the network. In the opposite case, the variability of the flow velocity along the network seems to play an important role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gandolfi et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: