Key result
The combined burden of frailty and poor cardiovascular health predicted all-cause and CVD mortality in a dose-response manner for females, while in males, this increased risk (HR 2.02-5.30 for all-cause mortality) was primarily observed in older individuals.
Why the study?
The effect of frailty and poor cardiovascular health on mortality for males and females is not fully elucidated.
Does the combined burden of frailty and poor cardiovascular health increase all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in US adults?
Cohort (n=35,207)
Does the combined burden of frailty and poor cardiovascular health increase all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in US adults?
Adding frailty assessments to standard cardiovascular health metrics identifies additional subgroups, particularly older males and females of all ages, who are at significantly higher risk for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support sex-specific frailty-CV risk assessment; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The effect of frailty and poor cardiovascular health on mortality for males and females is not fully elucidated. We investigated whether the combined burden of frailty and poor cardiovascular health is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality by sex and age. METHODS: We analyzed data of 35,207 non-institutionalized US residents aged 20-85 years old (mean age [standard deviation]: 46.6 [16.7 years], 51.4% female, 70.8% White, 10.3% Black, 13.2% Hispanic) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2015). Cardiovascular health was measured with the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 score (LS7). A 33-item frailty index (FI) was constructed to exclude cardiovascular health deficits. We grouped the FI into 0.1 increments (non-frail: FI < 0.10, very mildly frail: 0.1 ≤ FI < 0.20, mildly frail: 0.20 ≤ FI < 0.30, and moderately/severely frail: FI ≥ 0.30) and LS7 into tertiles (T1[poor] = 0-7, T2[intermediate] = 8-9, T3[ideal] = 10-14). All-cause and CVD mortality data were analyzed up to 16 years. All regression models were stratified by sex. RESULTS: The average FI was 0.09 (SD 0.10); 29.6% were at least very mildly frail, and the average LS7 was 7.9 (2.3). Mortality from all-causes and CVD were 8.5% (4228/35,207) and 6.1% (2917/35,207), respectively. The median length of follow-up was 8.1 years. The combined burden of frailty and poor cardiovascular health on mortality risk varied according to age in males (FI*age interaction p = 0.01; LS7*age interaction p < 0.001) but not in females. In females, poor FI and LS7 combined to predict all-cause and CVD mortality in a dose-response manner. All-cause and CVD mortality risk was greater for older males (60 and 70 years old) who were at least mildly frail and had intermediate cardiovascular health or worse (hazard ratio [lower/higher confidence interval ranges] range: all-cause mortality = 2.02-5.30 [1.20-4.04, 3.15-6.94]; CVD-related mortality = 2.22-7.16 [1.03-4.46, 4.49-11.50]) but not for younger males (30, 40, and 50 years old). CONCLUSIONS: The combined burden of frailty and LS7 on mortality is similar across all ages in females. In males, this burden is greater among older people. Adding frailty to assessments of overall cardiovascular health may identify more individuals at risk for mortality and better inform decisions to implement preventative or treatment approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quach et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in General population (non-institutionalized) (n=35,207). Combined burden of frailty (Frailty Index) and poor cardiovascular health (Life's Simple 7 score) vs. Non-frail and ideal cardiovascular health was evaluated on All-cause mortality in older males (60 and 70 years old) who were at least mildly frail and had intermediate cardiovascular health or worse (HR 2.02-5.30, 95% CI 1.20-4.04, 3.15-6.94). The combined burden of frailty and poor cardiovascular health predicted all-cause and CVD mortality in a dose-response manner for females, while in males, this increased risk (HR 2.02-5.30 for all-cause mortality) was primarily observed in older individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: