Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is demonstrated that cuprous oxide (Cu 2 O) can be electrodeposited epitaxially onto silicon (Si) and indium phosphide (InP) (001) single‐crystalline substrates from aqueous solution. Epitaxial electrodeposition under these conditions is remarkable considering the strong driving force for the formation of amorphous native oxide layers on Si and InP substrates. To elucidate the growth mechanisms, the microstructure of the interfaces between the Cu 2 O layer and the two different substrates was investigated by TEM (transmission electron microscopy) in conjunction with XEDS (X‐ray energy‐dispersive spectroscopy) and EELS (electron energy‐loss spectroscopy). In both heteroepitaxial systems, the Cu 2 O layers have a unique but non‐trivial crystallographic orientation relationship (OR) with the substrate, which can be described as a 45° rotation around the common [001] axis representing the substrate normal. We show that this relationship minimizes the overall misfit between corresponding interatomic spacings of the two adjacent crystals. In apparent contradiction to the unique OR, TEM revealed that in both hetero‐systems the Cu 2 O layer is separated from the substrate by an amorphous interlayer. The thickness of the interlayer typically is a few nanometers. The presence of an amorphous interlayer contrasts with our experimental results on electrodeposited Cu 2 O on Au (001) single‐crystal substrates, also included in this article, where TEM shows the Cu 2 O epilayer in direct contact with the substrate. XEDS and EELS analysis of the chemical composition and bonding at Cu 2 O/Si and Cu 2 O/InP interfaces in the as‐grown state as well as after tempering revealed that the interlayer is mainly composed of SiO 2 and InPO 4 , respectively. Most likely, the observed epitaxial layers on top of an amorphous interlayer evolve by nucleation of epitaxial Cu 2 O directly on the substrate. While simultaneous oxidation of the substrate leads to the formation of an amorphous layer, the epitaxial nuclei can laterally overgrow the oxide. Consequently, the local composition of the amorphous layer varies with the nature of the substrate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oba et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: