Why the study?
Does stent preservation with a St. Jude valve reduce operative mortality and complications compared to full explantation in patients with degenerated mitral bioprostheses?
Does stent preservation with a St. Jude valve reduce operative mortality and complications compared to full explantation in patients with degenerated mitral bioprostheses?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Leaving the mitral bioprosthetic stent intact and implanting a reversed aortic St. Jude valve simplifies reoperation and may reduce operative mortality compared to full explantation.
OBJECTIVE: The most common indication for reoperation in patients with a mitral bioprosthetic valve is primary tissue failure. Explanation of the bioprosthesis is time-consuming and may be complicated by cardiac rupture at the atrioventricular junction or the posterior left ventricular wall where a strut is imbedded, injury to the circumflex artery and late perivalvular leak. A new approach to avoid these complications by excising only the bioprosthetic tissue and attaching a reversed aortic St. Jude valve to the intact stent has been developed and evaluated. METHODS: We have replaced degenerated mitral bioprostheses with a St. Jude valve in 73 patients during the last 12 years. In 57, including all who had their operation before 1991, explantation was used. The stent was preserved in 16 patients; in the first four we implanted a mitral St. Jude valve (SJM) within the stent, but this only allows a SJM 6-8 mm smaller than the bioprosthesis. We evolved our approach in the last 12 patients to suture a reversed aortic St. Jude valve with extended cuff to the atrial side of the bioprosthetic cuff; this allows the use of a St. Jude valve 2 mm smaller than the bioprosthesis with exact matching of the orifice sizes. The demographic and clinical profiles of the two groups were similar. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 8/57 (14%) in the explantation group and none in the stent-preservation group. Three late perivalvular leaks occurred in the explanation group, and none in the stent-preservation group. Thirteen late deaths occurred in the explanation group, with a 5-year survival rate of 68%, and one late death (cancer) in the stent-preservation group, but the follow-up is significantly shorter. CONCLUSIONS: Leaving the mitral bioprosthetic stent and cuff intact eliminates the need for extensive dissection, thus shortening and simplifying the procedure and diminishing its attendant mortality and morbidity. It offers a safe and logical approach to replacement of a degenerated mitral bioprosthesis with a St. Jude valve of comparable size which projects into the left atrium, rather than a smaller one jammed into the orifice of the bioprosthetic stent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geha et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: