Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Starting from 5‐(4‐hydroxyphenyl)‐10,15,20‐tris(4‐methylphenyl)porphyrin ( 1a ), the new bis(porphyrinylphenoxy)alkanes 4a–c were synthesized by ether formation with the α,ω‐dibromoalkanes Br(CH 2 ) n Br ( n = 9,10; 3a, b ) and 1,4‐bis(3‐bromopropyl)‐2,5‐dimethoxybenzene ( 3c ). The bis‐[(porphyrinylphenoxy)propyl]hydroquinone dimethyl ether 4c derived from 3c was converted into the diporphyrin‐quinone 4e by methyl ether cleavage with BBr 3 and subsequent oxidation with ammonium cerium(IV) nitrate. The bisporphyrins 4a–c, e were metalated with cerium(III) acetylacetonate to yield the new cerium porphyrin sandwich complexes 5a–c, e which carry the alkane links in vicinal positions at the porphyrin rings. 5a–c, e were characterized by UV/Vis, IR, 1 H‐NMR spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. The quinone‐bridged cerium sandwich complex 5e contains the quinone moiety in a distinct non‐coplanar orientation relative to the porphyrin ligands of the double‐decker system. The length of the lateral chains may have a dramatic effect on the first and second oxidation potentials, E 3 and E 2 , of the porphyrin rings: for 5b having 10 aliphatic C atoms in the chain, E 3 and E 2 are higher by 0.26 and 0.24 V, respectively, as compared with 5a having only 9 aliphatic C atoms. E 3 and E 2 for the latter are rather close to values for species with dipropylbenzene chains (i.e. in 5c and 5e ) or without lateral bridges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buchler et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: