Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hospital in-patient statistics are an important outcome measurement in the assessment of the morbidity associated with diabetes mellitus. A prospective study of 157 consecutive admissions over a 28-day period compared diagnoses obtained from the clinical records with the ICD9 coding of the same admissions recorded at the Information and Statistics Division of the Scottish Health Service. Sixty-one percent of all discharge summaries omitted the diagnosis of diabetes. Even when admission was principally related to diabetes complications, 47% of medical and 88% of surgical discharge summaries omitted diabetes as a diagnostic category. ICD9 coding underestimated the percentage of admissions accounted for by diabetic patients by 100% (2.8 vs 5.6%) and as a result underestimated bed occupancy by over 200% (4.3 vs 13.7%), and is thus failing to fulfil its potential as a demographic and epidemiological record of resource use by disease classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leslie et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: