Three western species of the Aedes scutellaris group, A. alcasidi, A. hebrideus and A. scutellaris katherinensis, were tested for susceptibility to infection with Brugia pahangi and sub-periodic Wuchereria bancrofti. All were fully refractory to infection.Female A. alcasidi and A. s. katherinensis were crossed with males of A. polynesiensis and/or A. cooki, both of which are susceptible to B. pahangi and are natural vectors of W. bancrofti. The female hybrids were backcrossed to the parental susceptible stocks. The hybrids and the back-cross progeny were tested for filarial susceptibility. A. cooki was homozygous for the sex-linked marker white-eye.The hybrids were mostly refractory to infection; 4·9% were susceptible to B. pahangi and 1·7% susceptible to W. bancrofti. The susceptible hybrids carried a much lower worm load than the A. polynesiensis controls.The progeny of the backcross (A. s. katherinensis X A. polynesiensis) X A. polynesiensis had susceptibility rates of 14·8 and 25·7% to B. pahangi and W. bancrofti respectively. The pooled data, which were homogeneous, gave a rate of 23·1%.The progeny of the backcross (A. alcasidi X A. cooki) X A. cooki included both white- and black- eyed females. If susceptibility were sex-linked, the white-eyed progeny would be susceptible, except for the cross-over class, and the black-eyed progeny refractory. Only one of six white- eyed mosquitoes was susceptible to B. pahangi: in a large sample of black-eyed offspring 18·8% were susceptible to B. pahangi or W. bancrofti.The data suggest that nuclear factors are involved in the inheritance of susceptibility to the filarial infections, but there is no evidence of a single major gene. The observed susceptibility rates among the hybrids and backcross progeny do not permit a conclusion on the mode of inheritance of susceptibility factors, but the agreement between the results with B. pahangi and W. bancrofti supports the use of the former parasite as a laboratory model for studies of vector genetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meek et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: