In this letter, we carry out a comparative study of statistical models for multilook synthetic aperture radar amplitude images. Ten state-of-the-art statistical models are selected for comparison. To achieve a fair evaluation, we estimate all model parameters using the method of log-cumulants and apply the method to an image pyramid with varying pixel spacing (and resolution). The pyramid is created by different image product generation options. In addition to pixel spacing and resolution, we also consider the homogeneity of a scene for performance evaluation and we apply three performance measures. Through this study, it was found out that some models perform well for all resolutions, while the performance of other models depends heavily on the image content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: