Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The elemental composition and depth profiles of MgB 2 films prepared by successive e-beam evaporation as well as by thermal co-deposition of Mg and B components were investigated by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS). In the case of films deposited by e-beam evaporation we studied both Mg-B precursors and appropriate MgB 2 films grown on glassy carbon, Si(100) and J-sapphire substrates annealed in situ . For the films co-deposited by thermal evaporation on R-sapphire substrates and annealed ex situ we investigated superconducting MgB 2 films only. The T co values of all MgB 2 films ranged from 21 to 30 K. Because of a very fine granular structure of the annealed films, confirmed also by SEM observations, we could not identify any MgB 2 phase from x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns. On the other hand, Mg 2 Si phase has been detected by XRD on the film–substrate interface for the superconducting film deposited on Si(100) substrate. The RBS measurements were performed with a 3.1 MeV 4 He + beam. Under these conditions, the 16 O(α,α) 16 elastic resonance allowed us to detect oxygen in all studied samples especially in B layers. The depth profiles of precursors prepared by successive e-beam evaporation showed clearly the multilayer film structure consisting of B and Mg layers. A strong interdiffusion between B and Mg layers may be observed after an in situ annealing, but still some degree of non-homogeneous component distribution may be observed. On the other hand, the MgB 2 films co-deposited by thermal evaporation and annealed ex situ are much more homogeneous, but a higher content of oxygen is present.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheang-Wong et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: