Polypropylene film was biaxially stretched in one step in air at 140°C or 152°C, and the deformation was studied optically. A linear relation held between Δ n ss and v A −½ for v A > 10, at both temperatures, where Δ n ss is the birefringence with respect to the normal to the film and v A is the degree of stretching expressed as the factor by which the area of the film is increased. Extrapolation of data in this linear region yielded a value of 20 × 10 −3 for −Δ n ss at infinite v A . Since it is presumed that the polypropylene molecules lie completely parallel to the film surface when the film is stretched infinitely, −Δ n ss at v A −½ = 0 must be just half Δ n °, the intrinsic birefringence in the case of completely parallel orientation. Thus, Δ n ° must be 40 × 10 −3 . This value was obtained experimentally in uniaxial stretching when the birefringence with respect to the direction of drawing was extrapolated to infinite extension. Similar relations held between n p , the average of the refractive indices in the two stretching directions, and v A , and between n ss , the index normal to the film, and v A . By similar extrapolations, (1/2)( n ′ γ + n ′ β ) and n ′ β = n * α ′ were estimated, and thence n α′ was obtained. Here, n ′ α and n ′ β are the refractive indices along the c axis (molecular chain axis) and b axis. All these optical parameters refer to a density of 0.900 g/cm 3 . Hence by applying a density correction to those values, the principal refractive indices and the intrinsic birefringence of polypropylene crystal were evaluated as follows: n α = 1.5522, n β = n * α = 1.5106 and Δ n c ° = 4.16 × 10 −3 , where n * α is the refractive index prependicular to the b and c axes of the crystal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masuko et al. (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: