Key result
Targeted Care Navigation significantly reduced the hazard of 30-day hospital readmission compared with no care navigation (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.12-0.94).
Why the study?
Care navigation reduces preventable hospitalisation, but whether targeting it using an Electronic Health Record-derived readmission risk algorithm reduces rehospitalisation remained to be evaluated.
Does Targeted Care Navigation reduce hospital readmissions in at-risk acute care patients with non-surgical conditions?
Cohort (n=327)
No
Does Targeted Care Navigation reduce hospital readmissions in at-risk acute care patients with non-surgical conditions?
Hazard Ratio: 0.34 (95% CI 0.12–0.94)
Targeted care navigation using telephone follow-up by a registered nurse for 30 days post-discharge significantly reduces 30-day hospital readmissions in at-risk medical patients.
May support navigation programs to curb readmissions; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Care navigation is commonly used to reduce preventable hospitalisation. The use of Electronic Health Record-derived algorithms may enable better targeting of this intervention for greater impact. AIMS: To evaluate if community-based Targeted Care Navigation, supported by an Electronic Health Record-derived readmission risk algorithm, is associated with reduced rehospitalisation. METHODS: A propensity score matching cohort (5 comparison to 1 intervention cohort ratio) study was conducted in an 850-bed Victorian public metropolitan health service, Australia, from May to November 2017. Admitted acute care patients with a non-surgical condition, identified as at-risk of hospital readmission using an Electronic Health Record-derived readmission risk algorithm provide by the state health department, were eligible. Targeted Care Navigation involved telephone follow-up support provided for 30 days post-discharge by a registered nurse. The hazard ratio for hospital readmission was calculated at 30, 60 and 90 days post-discharge using multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards regression. RESULTS: Sixty-five recipients received care navigation and were matched to 262 people who did not receive care navigation. Excellent matching was achieved with standardised differences between groups being <0.1 for all 11 variables included in the propensity score, including the readmission risk score. The Targeted Care Navigation group had a significantly reduced hazard of readmission at 30 days (hazard ratio 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.12, 0.94) compared with the comparison group. The effect size was reduced at 60 and 90 days post-discharge. CONCLUSION: We provide preliminary evidence that Targeted Care Navigation supported by an Electronic Health Record-derived readmission risk algorithm may reduce 30-day hospital readmissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pang et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in At-risk of hospital readmission (n=327). Targeted Care Navigation vs. No care navigation was evaluated on Hospital readmission at 30 days post-discharge (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.94). Targeted Care Navigation significantly reduced the hazard of 30-day hospital readmission compared with no care navigation (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.12-0.94).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: