A 2 × 3 factorially designed experiment with 216 bull calves (288 ± 43 kg) was conducted in which tempered and dry barley grains were lightly rolled (most of kernels cracked, few broken), medium rolled, or crushed (almost all kernels broken) and included in a feedlot diet containing 90% concentrate and 10% barley silage on a dry matter (DM) basis. In the tempering process 6% water was added to the control barley, which initially contained 13% moisture, and the damp grain was allowed to stand overnight at room temperature before rolling. Tempering had no influence on rate or efficiency of gain of the bulls during the 134-d trial or on carcass characteristics. Cattle fed slightly rolled, medium rolled, and crushed barley (kernel thicknesses of 2.70, 2.56 and 2.31 mm) gained 1.55, 1.57 and 1.61 kg d −1 , respectively, with no difference detected between treatments. Corresponding DM intakes were 8.04, 7.79 and 7.54 kg d −1 (P < 0.05). Dry matter intake to gain ratios were 5.20, 4.96 and 4.68 (P < 0.05). Carcasses of bulls fed crushed barley had more (P < 0.05) grade fat than bulls fed slightly rolled barley. It was concluded that there was no advantage in tempering barley which initially contained 13% moisture. Efficiency of gain was improved as the degree of processing of barley was increased.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathison et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: