Key result
Ticagrelor or prasugrel linked to ~56% lower long-term mortality vs clopidogrel in ACS.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the long-term clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy with potent P2Y12 inhibitors compared to clopidogrel in patients with ACS.
Do potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor or prasugrel) reduce long-term mortality and MACE compared to clopidogrel in patients with ACS?
Cohort (n=708)
Yes
Do potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor or prasugrel) reduce long-term mortality and MACE compared to clopidogrel in patients with ACS?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with ACS, treatment with potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor or prasugrel) is associated with significantly reduced long-term mortality and 1-year MACE compared to clopidogrel.
AIM: To investigate the long-term clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy with potent P2Y12 inhibitors compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: In this prospective multicenter observational study, we enrolled 708 patients with ACS treated with clopidogrel (n = 137), ticagrelor (n = 260) or prasugrel (n = 311). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE; over 1 year) and long-term mortality (median: 5.6 years; interquartile range [IQR] 4.9-6.5 years) were assessed. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) was used to measure adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation. RESULTS: Type of P2Y12 inhibitor emerged as an independent predictor of long-term mortality and MACE: patients treated with potent platelet inhibitors prasugrel or ticagrelor were at lower risk for long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22-0.92; P = .028) or MACE (adjusted HR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.20-0.73; P = .004) than those treated with clopidogrel independent from clinical risk factors. In contrast, the efficacy of clopidogrel decreased with increasing severity of ACS: platelet aggregation was 37% higher in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 25% higher in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) compared to patients with unstable angina (P = .039). Patients with diabetes achieved less potent ADP- and AA-induced platelet inhibition under clopidogrel, compared to patients without diabetes (P = .045; P = .030, respectively). CONCLUSION: In the setting of ACS, treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel reduced long-term mortality and 1-year MACE as compared to clopidogrel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gager et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=708). Ticagrelor or prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Long-term all-cause mortality (over median 5.6 years) (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.92, p=0.028). Ticagrelor or prasugrel treatment reduced long-term mortality by 56% (adjusted HR 0.44, P = 0.028) and 1-year MACE by 62% (adjusted HR 0.38, P = 0.004) compared to clopidogrel in ACS patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: