Why the study?
Does initial 24-hour lavage improve treatment success or time to solved infection in CAPD patients with acute peritonitis compared to continued routine CAPD schedule?
Does initial 24-hour lavage improve treatment success or time to solved infection in CAPD patients with acute peritonitis compared to continued routine CAPD schedule?
Initial 24-hour lavage offers no clinical benefit over continued routine CAPD schedule for the treatment of CAPD peritonitis in hemodynamically stable patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Initial lavage adds no benefit in CAPD peritonitis; confirms routine exchanges suffice and challenges lavage as adjunct in stable patients.
A randomized trial was conducted to examine the influence of initial lavage on treatment of CAPD peritonitis. Patients with hypotension and shock were excluded from the trial. Thirty-six CAPD patients with acute peritonitis were randomized to treatment with intraperitoneal antibiotics including either initial 24 hours lavage before resumption of routine CAPD schedule (prior standard approach) or continued prolonged exchanges as in routine CAPD schedule. Median time to solved infection (normalization of white cell count in dialysis effluent) was identical (3 days) in the two groups. Treatment success rate was found to be 72% in the group with initial lavage and 89% in the group with prolonged exchanges. The difference in treatment success (17%) in favour of continued CAPD schedule was not found significant (95% confidence limits--1% to 35%). The results suggest lavage to be of no clinical benefit in treatment of CAPD peritonitis in patients without profound hypotension and shock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ejlersen et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: