Key result
Selective estrogen receptor modulators offer safer, targeted cardiovascular benefits compared to endogenous estrogens.
The cloning of estrogen receptors (ERs) and generation of ER-deficient mice have increased our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular effects of estrogen. It is conceivable that clinical trials of estrogens so far failed to improve cardiovascular health because of the poor ER isoform selectivity and tissue specificity of endogenous hormones as well as incorrect treatment timing and regimens. Tissue-selective ER modulators (SERMs) may be safer agents than endogenous estrogens for cardiovascular disease. Yet, designing isoform-selective ER ligands (I-SERMs) with agonist or antagonist activity is required to pursue improved pharmacological control of ERs, especially taking into account emerging evidence for the beneficial role of vascular ER alpha activation. Ideally, the quest for unique ER ligands targeted to the vascular wall should lead to compounds that merge the pharmacological profiles of SERM and I-SERM agents. This review highlights the current bases for and approaches to selective ER modulation in the cardiovascular system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolego et al. (2006) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and isoform-selective ER ligands (I-SERMs) vs. Endogenous estrogens was evaluated. Tissue-selective estrogen receptor modulators and isoform-selective ER ligands offer potential for safer, targeted cardiovascular benefits compared to endogenous estrogens.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: