This article reviews the state-of-the-art research and development in the 3D filling simulation of injection molding, most notably the different models. The article organizes prior studies into three sequential categories, namely, mid-plane models, surface models, and solid models. In the mid-plane models, the arbitrary planar mid-plane is used to represent the three-dimensional geometry of the part. Their model and formulation are presented based on the Hele—Shaw approximation. The article further discusses the main disadvantage of the mid-plane models, which introduces the surface models. The surface models represent a three-dimensional part with a boundary or skin mesh on the outside surfaces of a solid geometric model. This kind of model still adopts the Hele—Shaw approximation, but can avoid the re-modeling of the mid-plane. Subsequently, the situations that cannot be accurately predicted using the Hele—Shaw approximation are discussed, in which a full 3D simulation has become a promising solution. The leading 3D simulation approaches are summarized, including the finite element method, the finite volume method, the control-volume-based finite-element-method, and the boundary element method. The tracking algorithms of the melt fronts are also described.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dário de Souza Cardozo (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: