Key result
ICE visualizes the right phrenic nerve in ~92% of patients, guiding safe SVC isolation.
Why the study?
Right phrenic nerve injury is a complication of AF ablation, but existing prevention and detection approaches cannot directly visualize the nerve in real time during the procedure.
Is real-time visualization and mapping of the right phrenic nerve using intracardiac echocardiography feasible and safe for guiding superior vena cava isolation during atrial fibrillation ablation?
Cohort (n=38)
No
Is real-time visualization and mapping of the right phrenic nerve using intracardiac echocardiography feasible and safe for guiding superior vena cava isolation during atrial fibrillation ablation?
Intracardiac echocardiography placed in the superior vena cava enables direct real-time visualization and 3D mapping of the right phrenic nerve in 92% of patients, offering a novel method to personalize ablation lines and avoid phrenic nerve injury during atrial fibrillation ablation.
May support ICE-guided SVC isolation to avoid phrenic injury in AF ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of real-time visualization and mapping of the right phrenic nerve (RPN) by using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. BACKGROUND: RPN injury is a complication associated with the ablation of AF. Multiple approaches are currently being used to prevent and detect RPN injuries. However, none of these approaches can directly visualize the RPN in real-time during the ablation procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The RPN was detected using ICE. The RPN and its adjacent structures were analysed. The relationship between the RPN's distance from the superior vena cava (SVC) and its pacing capture threshold was quantified. The safety of SVC isolation guided by the ICE-visualized RPN was evaluated. Thirty-eight people were enrolled in this study. The RPN was visualized by ICE in 92% of patients. It ran through the space between the SVC and the mediastinal pleura and had a 'straw'-like appearance upon ICE imaging. The course of the RPN was close to the SVC (minimum 1.0 ± 0.4 mm) and the right superior pulmonary vein (minimum 14.1 ± 7.3 mm). There was a positive linear correlation between the RPN's capture threshold and its distance from the SVC (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.728, < 0.001). SVC isolation was guided by the RPN; none of the patients developed an RPN injury. CONCLUSIONS: RPN can be visualized by ICE in most patients, thus providing a novel approach for the real-time detection of RPN during AF ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation (n=38). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) visualization and mapping of the right phrenic nerve (RPN) was evaluated on Feasibility of real-time visualization of the right phrenic nerve (RPN) using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Intracardiac echocardiography visualized the right phrenic nerve in 92% of atrial fibrillation ablation patients, guiding superior vena cava isolation with 0% nerve injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: