Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
What we label as affordable clustered housing-care options are making it increasingly possible for poor and frail older Americans to age in place comfortably and securely in residential-like settings combining both affordable shelter and long-term care. The hallmark of these housing arrangements is their sizable population clusters of low-income frail persons in need of supportive services. Despite their greater availability and the compelling factors underlying their growth, the diversity of their supportive services and operations cloud their identity resulting in uncertainty as to whether they have a common mission. In response to the need for a more careful delineation of this aging in place option, this paper describes the distinguishing features of these hybrid settings and constructs a typology of their representative exemplars or prototypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen M. Golant (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: