Many companies face the challenge of outsourcing to low-cost countries. Still, many managers seem to be uncertain about (1) which inputs should be selected for this exercise; (2) which countries are preferred; and (3) whether to deal directly with suppliers or through a local distributor or agent. This paper deals with these three aspects in offering a practical and tested method, derived from theory. In each of four steps, inputs are filtered out that are less suitable for sourcing from low-cost countries. Step 1 clusters all of the hundreds of inputs into 50–90 product families. A portfolio analysis of the resulting product families in Step 2 enables differentiation in the nature of goods and services acquired and their supplier relationship characteristics. In this step, unique products and low volume, low-value inputs are filtered out. In Step 3, managers score the remaining product families on operationalized process- and product characteristics. Based on these scores, product families are assigned to four categories: (1) “Global Sourcing” or direct offshoring; (2) “Source Global, Buy Local” or indirect offshoring — for example produced in China but bought through a local agent/distributor; (3) “Buy Regional” or nearshoring; and (4) “Vicinity Buying.” Step 4 compares the present total costs of product families with the potential total costs after a switch toward the proposed areas. A case study revealed a significant potential for reduction in total costs for selected product families. In practice, the method serves three ends: (1) it clarifies the various product- and process characteristics that are perceived as important by stakeholders involved; (2) it guides the selection process of potential product families and potential areas in a structured way; and (3) it makes visible the financial results of alternatives to the present way of sourcing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamann et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: