A procedure is investigated for estimating the proportion of vectors capable of transmitting aster-yellows virus in a natural population of Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal), the six-spotted leafhopper. A straightforward method and one used in practice is to collect random samples of the population and cage insects individually with previously unexposed aster test plants. If a plant exhibits aster-yellows symptoms in a given time interval, the insect is classified as a vector, and the proportion of infected plants is an estimator of the proportion of vectors in the population. When large numbers of insects are available, this procedure requires a considerable overhead in plants and cages, and it is desirable to use several insects on each plant. If k insects are caged with each plant, the outcome is still binomial, for the experimenter can distinguish only two types of test plants; infected and non-infected. If p is the probability that a randomly selected insect is a vector, the probability that a plant is non-infected is equal to (1 p)k. Some properties of the maximum likelihood estimator of p when such a procedure is used are investigated in this paper, and a method for determining the optimum number of insects per plant for certain cost considerations is given. In general, it will be seen that the experimenter should choose k small and n large, commensurate with costs, to insure against the risk of a dangerously inefficient experiment when little or no information is available regarding p. A closely related problem is the estimation of the frequency or density ,u of a population of microorganisms when a binomial classification only of each sample is possible or desirable, but where the distribution of the number of individuals in a diluted sample is Poisson. This dilution procedure was developed by R. A. Fisher [1921], Fisher et. al. [1922], and is discussed at length by Fisher and Yates [1948], Cochran [1950], and D. J. Finney [1952]. If the population density is ,u, the samples are usually diluted or concentrated by a factor z > 0 such that the density
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keith H. Thompson (1962) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: