Key result
A smartphone-based cardiac rehabilitation program demonstrated feasibility for guiding exercise intensity, estimating heart rate with a mean absolute error of 6.16 bpm and root mean squared error of 4.30 bpm.
Why the study?
Does a smartphone-based cardiac rehabilitation program accurately estimate heart rate and detect motion artifacts compared to Holter monitoring during exercise?
Does a smartphone-based cardiac rehabilitation program accurately estimate heart rate and detect motion artifacts compared to Holter monitoring during exercise?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A smartphone-based cardiac rehabilitation program using the built-in camera for heart rate monitoring is feasible and provides reasonable accuracy during exercise, potentially increasing accessibility to cardiac rehabilitation.
We introduce a cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP) that utilizes only a smartphone, with no external devices. As an efficient guide for cardiac rehabilitation exercise, we developed an application to automatically indicate the exercise intensity by comparing the estimated heart rate (HR) with the target heart rate zone (THZ). The HR is estimated using video images of a fingertip taken by the smartphone's built-in camera. The introduced CRP app includes pre-exercise, exercise with intensity guidance, and post-exercise. In the pre-exercise period, information such as THZ, exercise type, exercise stage order, and duration of each stage are set up. In the exercise with intensity guidance, the app estimates HR from the pulse obtained using the smartphone's built-in camera and compares the estimated HR with the THZ. Based on this comparison, the app adjusts the exercise intensity to shift the patient's HR to the THZ during exercise. In the post-exercise period, the app manages the ratio of the estimated HR to the THZ and provides a questionnaire on factors such as chest pain, shortness of breath, and leg pain during exercise, as objective and subjective evaluation indicators. As a key issue, HR estimation upon signal corruption due to motion artifacts is also considered. Through the smartphone-based CRP, we estimated the HR accuracy as mean absolute error and root mean squared error of 6.16 and 4.30bpm, respectively, with signal corruption due to motion artifacts being detected by combining the turning point ratio and kurtosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2016) studied Cardiac rehabilitation (n=32). Smartphone-based cardiac rehabilitation program (S-CRP) vs. Holter monitor (ECG) was evaluated on Heart rate estimation accuracy (mean absolute error and root mean squared error). A smartphone-based cardiac rehabilitation program demonstrated feasibility for guiding exercise intensity, estimating heart rate with a mean absolute error of 6.16 bpm and root mean squared error of 4.30 bpm.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: