Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recurrent chromosome abnormalities as defined in the World Health Organization (WHO) play a major role in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Herein, we describe two cases of hematologic malignancies with chromosomal abnormalities mimicking WHO-define recurrent abnormalities. Both cases demonstrate clinical utility of interphase and metaphase fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) in confirming the WHO defined recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities. The first is a case of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with both t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) and inv(3)(q21q26.2) by conventional cytogenetics but no EVI1::MECOM rearrangement by FISH. The second is a case of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) with deletion of 11q (ATM) and a subclone with deletion of 6q (MYB) and t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) detected by conventional cytogenetics but no BCR::ABL1 fusion by FISH. These cases demonstrate that conventional cytogenetics and FISH studies are complementary and especially so when recurrent abnormalities are suggested by karyotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shivani Golem (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: