Key result
Adherence to a 3-month home blood pressure monitoring program significantly increased the achievement of target blood pressure compared to non-adherence (78.0% vs 44.4%, p=0.041).
Why the study?
HBPM may reduce white-coat hypertension risk and encourage patient ownership, but its role in treatment follow-up required assessment.
Does home-based blood pressure monitoring improve blood pressure control and target attainment in hypertensive patients?
Cohort (n=100)
No
Does home-based blood pressure monitoring improve blood pressure control and target attainment in hypertensive patients?
Implementation of home blood pressure monitoring in a cohort of hypertensive patients significantly improved blood pressure control, medication adherence, and patient awareness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HBPM may aid follow-up in hypertension; leaves open outcome benefit in randomized trials.
Background: The main benefit of home-based blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is the potential approach to reduce the risk of white-coat hypertension (HTN) and to encourage patients to take ownership of their condition. This study was conducted to assess the role of HBPM in treatment follow-up in a cohort of hypertensive patients. Materials and methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted from December 2017 to May 2018. A total of 100 patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected by purposive sampling from Medicine Outdoor of Dhaka Medical College Hospital (DMCH). In total, 100 hypertensive patients were enrolled, and informed consent was obtained. Subsequently, the study subjects received information and training on BP self-management and performed 2 resting measurements per day for 4 days per week for 3 months. All measurements were performed using validated BP monitors.The study endpoints included patient awareness, attainment of BP goals, adherence to antihypertensive treatment, lifestyle modification, assessment of discrepancy between office and HBPM, and white coat HTN or masked HTN at 3 months. SPSS version 22.0 was used for data analysis and reporting. Results: Overall, the mean age was 57.76 ±12.60 years with a range of 34 – 80 years. Males were more prevalent than females, and the ratio was 1.17:1. The majority of cases (76.0%) had established HTN with a history of taking medication, whereas others were non-compliant with medications. Among them 47% had obesity, and 24% had diabetes mellitus. Of the patients, 91% adherence to HBP monitoring, 84.0% adherence to medication, and 75.0% achieved their target BP. The achievement of target blood pressure was significantly higher among the study subjects who adhered to HBP monitoring, and the p-value was < 0.04 (Fisher’s Exact test). Conclusion: In a cohort of patients with arterial hypertension, information, and training on BP self-measurement and direct involvement of patients using HBPM led to improvement in BP control and could be an effective method by incorporating it into the usual care of hypertensive patients in the hypertension management center of the community. J MEDICINE 2024; 25: 17-23
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nupur et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=100). Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) vs. Non-adherence to HBPM was evaluated on Attainment of target blood pressure (p=0.041). Adherence to a 3-month home blood pressure monitoring program significantly increased the achievement of target blood pressure compared to non-adherence (78.0% vs 44.4%, p=0.041).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: