Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psycholinguistic experiment reveals language transfer and semantic cue preference in second-language learners, indicating meaning-based strategies precede grammar-based processing.
In an experiment based on the competition model, 12 native Japanese speakers (J1 group) and 12 native English speakers studying Japanese (JFL group) were requested to report sentence subjects after listening to Japanese word strings which consisted of one verb and two nouns each. Similarly, 12 native English speakers (E1 group) and 12 native Japanese speakers studying English (EFL group) reported the sentence subjects of English word strings. In each word string, syntactic (word order) cues and lexical-semantic (animacy/inanimacy) cues converged or diverged as to the assignment of the sentence subjects. The results show that JFL-Ss (experimental subjects) closely approximated the response patterns of J1-Ss, while EFL-Ss showed evidence of transfer from their first language, Japanese. The results are consistent with the developmental precedence of a meaning-based comprehension strategy over a grammar-based one.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshinori Sasaki (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: