A personalized, strike early and strong lipid-lowering strategy in acute MI patients reduced 1-year MACE incidence to 3%, compared to 12% and 11% with previous stepwise approaches (P=0.026).
Cohort (n=500)
No
Does a personalized strike early and strong lipid-lowering approach improve LDL-C goal achievement and reduce MACE in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Implementing a strike early and strong lipid-lowering strategy in acute MI patients significantly improves LDL-C target achievement and reduces 1-year MACE compared to a traditional stepwise approach.
p-value: p=0.026
AIMS: Considering the lack of evidence, we evaluated the impact on cardiovascular outcome of the systematic introduction in our institution of a personalized strike early and strong (SES) approach for lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed data from 500 consecutive patients hospitalized across three periods: Period A (N = 198, January-June 2019), when the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal was <70 mg/dL and a stepwise LLT approach was recommended; Period B (N = 180, January-June 2021), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and a stepwise approach was recommended; Period C (N = 122, January-June 2023), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and our SES protocol was implemented. Primary endpoints were achievement of the LDL-C goal during follow-up and 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Compared to the other periods, in Period C, there was a higher use of potent statins, alone or in combination with ezetimibe, and of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor inhibitors at discharge. This translated into higher achievement of the LDL-C goal (83% vs. 55% in Period A and 43% in Period B; P < 0.001) and reduced incidence of MACE (3% vs. 12% and 11%; P = 0.026). MACE rates were lowest in patients with early and sustained LDL-C <55 mg/dL and in those achieving both LDL-C <55 mg/dL and ≥50% LDL-C reduction. CONCLUSION: The systematic introduction of a personalized, SES strategy for LLT in patients with acute MI led to greater achievement of LDL-C goal and lower risk of MACE at 1 year vs. the stepwise approach.
Patti et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=500). Personalized strike early and strong (SES) lipid-lowering therapy vs. Stepwise lipid-lowering therapy approach was evaluated on 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (p=0.026). A personalized, strike early and strong lipid-lowering strategy in acute MI patients reduced 1-year MACE incidence to 3%, compared to 12% and 11% with previous stepwise approaches (P=0.026).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: