This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Cationic arene ruthenium-based tetranuclear complexes comprising rectangular structures have been obtained from the dinuclear arene ruthenium complexes [Ru 2 (arene) 2 ( OO ∩ OO ) 2 Cl 2 ] (arene = p- cymene, hexamethylbenzene; OO ∩ OO = 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoquinonato, 2,5-dichloro-1,4-benzoquinonato) by reaction with pyrazine or bipyridine linkers ( N ∩ N = pyrazine, 4,4′-bipyridine, 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene) in methanol in the presence of AgO 3 SCF 3, forming tetranuclear cations of general formula [Ru 4 (arene) 4 ( N ∩ N ) 2 ( OO ∩ OO ) 2 ] 4+ . All complexes were isolated in good yield as triflate salts and were characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy and studied by cyclic voltammetry. The cytotoxicities of the water-soluble compounds of the 4,4′-bipyridine and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene series have been established using ovarian A2780 cancer cells. The large rectangles incorporating 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene linkers are ca. 5 times more cytotoxic (IC 50 ≤ 6 μM) than the 4,4′-bipyridine-containing cations (IC 50 ≥ 30 μM). Structural characterization by X-ray diffraction of two representative compounds, i.e., the triflate salts of [Ru 4 (hexamethylbenzene) 4 (4,4′-bipyridine) 2 (2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoquinonato) 2 ] 4+ and [Ru 4 (hexamethylbenzene) 4 (1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene) 2 (2,5-dichloro-1,4-benzoquinonato) 2 ] 4+, reveals differently sized cavities, different flexibilities, and different packing arrangements, suggesting a correlation between these structural properties and the observed cytotoxicities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mattsson et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: