Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The synthesis and characterization of a three‐dimensional inorganic‐organic hybrid network [{Cu 2 (CA) 3 }{(H 3 O) 2 (phz) 3 }·G] n ( 1 ; H 2 CA = chloranilic acid, phz = phenazine; G = 2CH 3 COCH 3 ·2H 2 O) is described. The crystal structure of 1 shows that the 3D network assembly is based on a combination of two types of grid‐building sub‐units of (6,3) topology: an anionic metal‐organic coordination honeycomb grid, and a cationic hydronium‐ion‐mediated organic honeycomb grid. The inorganic and organic honeycomb nets are perfectly π−π‐stacked, creating an infinite number of open‐end channels (channel size about 8 Å in diameter). The solid framework of 1 retains its rigidity upon removal of the guest molecules under high vacuum to form compound [{Cu 2 (CA) 3 }{(H 3 O) 2 (phz) 3 }] n ( 2 ) as revealed by a single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Compounds [{M 2 (CA) 3 }{(H 3 O) 2 (phz) 3 }·G] n (M = Cd, 3 ; M = Zn, 4 ; M = Co, 5 ; G = 2CH 3 COCH 3 ·2H 2 O) were also prepared and characterized as isostructures of 1 [crystal data for 1 : Cu 2 (CA) 3 (H 3 O) 2 (phz) 3 ·G, trigonal, space group P 3 1 m , formula mass = 1478.86, a = 13.7593(2) Å, c = 9.1869(2) Å, V = 1506.22(5) Å 3 , Z = 1; crystal data for 2 : Cu 2 (CA) 3 (H 3 O) 2 (phz) 3 , trigonal, space group P 3 1 m , formula mass = 1326.62, a = 13.7565(4) Å, c = 9.1544(5) Å, V = 1500.3(1) Å 3 , Z = 1]. The magnetic‐exchange coupling between the copper centers for compound 1 was analyzed on the basis of the Curie−Weiss expression and a dinuclear magnetic model. The negative values of the Weiss constant and the magnetic‐exchange coupling constant indicate an antiferromagnetic interaction between the copper centers. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2004)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: