Transportation investments are nearing $1,000 per capita annually in the USA, and the Highway Trust Fund has been depleted. Such significant investments and budget-constrained contexts demand careful decision-making and thoughtful cost-benefit analyses. A project evaluation toolkit has been developed for comprehensive assessment of network expansion and pricing projects with only project expenditures, link attributes, and traffic counts as required inputs. The toolkit uses a self-contained travel demand model to predict future and alternative scenario traffic volumes, speeds, crash counts, emissions, and toll revenues while providing project-summary measures, including net present value and benefit-cost ratios. The toolkit seeks to provide early assessment of major project plans along abstracted networks, using hundreds of coded links (rather than thousands), providing results in a matter of minutes (rather than days). This paper describes the model and develops two case-study sites, each with several alternative scenarios. The first examines capacity expansion projects along a highly congested link on the periphery of Austin, Texas, while the second focuses on strategies to reduce traffic in central Austin through tolling and capacity-reduction projects. Toolkit results show which projects merit further consideration by summarizing and monetizing impacts across scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fagnant et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: