The Ru-catalyzed allylation of differing indole compounds using ArCH(OH)CH═CH 2 (Ar = Ph, 2-CH 3 C 6 H 4, 2-CH 3 OC 6 H 4 2-ClC 6 H 4, and 1-naphthyl) is relatively fast (usually <30 min for 100% conversion) at ambient temperature in the presence of [Ru(Cp*)(CH 3 CN) 3 ](PF 6 ) + a sulfonic acid cocatalyst, RSO 3 H (R = p -tolyl, a camphor fragment or CH 3 ). The new catalysts allow allyl alcohols rather than carbonates, halides, acetates, etc., to be used as substrates in this allylation chemistry, thereby avoiding the use of a (wasted) leaving group. The branched products are favored, and in a number of examples b/l ratios in excess of 20 are observed. The catalyst is selective in that there is little or no N-allylation. The use of acids such as CF 3 SO 3 H or HBF 4 results in slower and/or less selective reactions. Although phosphoric acid additives show some promise, carboxylic acids are much less effective or do not catalyze the reaction at all. The preformed isolated complexes [Ru(Cp*)(η 3 -C 3 H 5 )(RSO 3 ) 2 ] are efficient catalyst precursors; however, NMR experiments suggest that one of the active species is the monosulfonate cationic complex [Ru(Cp*)(η 3 -C 3 H 5 )(CH 3 CN)(RSO 3 )] + . Stoichiometric oxidative addition reactions are shown to be relatively rapid. New Ru(Cp*) complexes have been generated and characterized by NMR methods. DFT calculations suggest that the large b/l ratios observed have a structural basis in that the Ru−C(allyl) bond length for the substituted terminal allyl carbon, Ru−C(1), is relatively long. X-ray structures for Ru(Cp*)(η 3 -C 3 H 5 )(SO 4 ) and the dication [Ru(Cp*)(η 3 -C 3 H 5 )(H 2 O) 2 ] 2+ (as a camphor sulfonate salt) are reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gruber et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: