Let x be a signal to be sparsely decomposed over a redundant dictionary A, i.e., a sparse coefficient vector s has to be found such that x = As. It is known that this problem is inherently unstable against noise, and to overcome this instability, Donoho, Elad and Temlyakov ["Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 6-18, Jan. 2006] have proposed to use an "approximate" decomposition, that is, a decomposition satisfying ∥x - As∥2≤ δ rather than satisfying the exact equality x = As. Then, they have shown that if there is a decomposition with ∥s∥0-1)/2, where M denotes the coherence of the dictionary, this decomposition would be stable against noise. On the other hand, it is known that a sparse decomposition with ∥s∥000-1)/2, because usually (1 + M-1)/2 ≪ (1/2)spark(A). This limitation maybe had not been very important before, because ∥s∥0-1)/2 is also the bound which guaranties that the sparse decomposition can be found via minimizing the l1norm, a classic approach for sparse decomposition. However, with the availability of new algorithms for sparse decomposition, namely SL0 and robust-SLO, it would be important to know whether or not unique sparse decompositions with (1 + M-1)/2 ≤ ∥s∥00-1)/2 to the whole uniqueness range ∥s∥0 <;; (1/2)spark(A). In summary, we show that all unique sparse decompositions are stably recoverable. Moreover, we see that sparser decompositions are "more stable".
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babaie‐Zadeh et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: