Key result
Abciximab fails to reduce periprocedural ischemic events in elective carotid artery stenting.
RCT (n=74)
Randomized
Absolute Event Rate: 19% vs 8%
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abciximab has been shown to significantly reduce thromboembolic complications of coronary artery stenting. A prospective, randomized study was performed to test whether abciximab has comparable beneficial effects in carotid artery stenting. METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive patients undergoing elective stenting of the carotid artery were included in the study. Standard antithrombotic medication consisted of aspirin, clopidogrel, and heparin. In addition, half of the patients received an abciximab bolus of 0.25 mg/kg body weight given prophylactically before the intervention. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in all but 1 patient. In patients receiving abciximab, ischemic complications consisted of 4 transient ischemic attacks, 1 minor stroke, 1 nonfatal major stroke, and 1 fatal stroke caused by cerebral hemorrhage. In the control group, 2 transient ischemic attacks and 1 major nonfatal stroke occurred. In summary, the total number of periprocedural ischemic events was 7 (19%) in the abciximab group and 3 (8%) in the control group. Nonischemic complications consisted of 1 inguinal hematoma requiring blood transfusions in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab bolus given prophylactically before elective carotid artery stenting does not reduce ischemic complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hofmann et al. (2002) conducted an RCT in Elective carotid artery stenting (n=74). Abciximab vs. Standard antithrombotic medication (aspirin, clopidogrel, and heparin) was evaluated on Periprocedural ischemic events. Prophylactic abciximab bolus before elective carotid artery stenting did not reduce periprocedural ischemic events, which occurred in 19% of the abciximab group versus 8% of the control group.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: