Key result
Renal angioplasty linked to ~22 mmHg lower SBP over 4-year follow-up.
Cohort (n=224)
Yes
Multicenter retrospective study shows reduced blood pressure and medication need in renal artery stenosis patients, suggesting sustained clinical benefits of angioplasty.
Purpose: To investigate contemporary results of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA).Materials and Methods: A multicentre retrospective study analysing all patients treated with PTRA for primary symptomatic renal artery stenosis (RAS) between 2010 and 2013 at four tertiary centres. Procedures during the preceding four years were counted to evaluate for change in PTRA frequency.Results: The number of PTRA procedures decreased by approximately 50% from 2006 to 2013. Patients treated in the post-ASTRAL period (n = 224) had a significant reduction in mean systolic pressure (168 to 146 mmHg, p < 0.01), diastolic pressure (84 to 76 mmHg, p < 0.01), number of anti-hypertensive drugs (3.54 to 3.05, p < 0.01), and anti-hypertensive treatment index (21.75 to 16.92, p < 0.01) compared to before PTRA. These improvements were maintained at one year and at the last clinical evaluation after a mean follow-up of 4.31 years. Renal function increased transiently without sustained improvement, or deterioration, during later follow-up. Thirteen patients (5.8%) eventually required dialysis, nine of these had eGFR <20 ml/min/1.73 m2 before PTRA. There was no difference in outcomes between subgroups differentiated by different indications for PTRA.Conclusion: The frequency of PTRA has decreased, indicating a higher threshold for invasive treatment of RAS in recent years. The reduction in blood pressures, the reduced need for anti-hypertensive medication, and stabilization of renal function over time suggest a clinical benefit for most patients who are now being treated with PTRA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zachrisson et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in primary symptomatic renal artery stenosis (RAS) (n=224). Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) vs. Before PTRA (baseline) was evaluated on Mean systolic blood pressure (p=<0.01). Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty significantly reduced mean systolic blood pressure from 168 to 146 mmHg (P<0.01) after a mean follow-up of 4.31 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: