Key result
Computer-based risk scoring methods require clinical understanding to effectively guide cardiovascular decision-making.
RCT
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chris Isles (2000) conducted an RCT in Primary prevention of coronary heart disease. Computer-based clinical decision support systems for risk assessment was evaluated. The randomised comparison of three risk assessment scoring methods highlights that clinical understanding of recommendations from computer-based decision support systems is required alongside technological development.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: