No AccessJournal of Urology1 Apr 1951Hydrodynamics of Upper Urinary Tract After Mucosal Ureterosigmoidostomy: Case Report* James M. Whisenand, and Vincent Moore James M. WhisenandJames M. Whisenand More articles by this author , and Vincent MooreVincent Moore More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)68521-5AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1951 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByGoodwin W and Scardino P (2018) UreterosigmoidostomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 118, NO. 1 Part 2, (169-174), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1977.Prentiss R, Mullenix R and Feeney M (2018) Ureteral Implantation: Clinical ExperiencesJournal of Urology, VOL. 77, NO. 4, (600-613), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1957.Clarke B and Leadbetter W (2018) Ureterosigmoidostomy: Collective Review of Results in 2897 Reported CasesJournal of Urology, VOL. 73, NO. 6, (999-1008), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1955.Rusche C and Cook W (2018) A Study of Hydrodynamics of the Upper Urinary Tract following UreterosigmoidostomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 70, NO. 3, (447-453), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1953.Baker R and Miller G (2018) The Physiology of the Uretero-Intestinal Anastomosis: I. Ureteral RefluxJournal of Urology, VOL. 67, NO. 5, (638-643), Online publication date: 1-May-1952. Volume 65Issue 4April 1951Page: 564-570 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1951 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information James M. Whisenand More articles by this author Vincent Moore More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whisenand et al. (1951) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: